Chapter 9: Indexing Layer 2 Chains and Custom Data
Posted inSolidity Advance The graph

Chapter 9: Indexing Layer 2 Chains and Custom Data

No Comments

Overview of Indexing Layer 2 Chains and Custom Data

Imagine Layer 2 chains as turbo boosters for a main blockchain like Ethereum (the Layer 1). They’re built on top to make transactions faster and cheaper, while still leaning on Ethereum’s rock-solid security. Think of them as express lanes for processing stuff without clogging up the main highway

Key Concepts in Indexing Layer 2 Chains

  1. Why Index L2 Chains?
    • Scalability: L2 chains process thousands of transactions off-chain, batching them into a single L1 transaction. Indexing allows dApps to query L2 data without scanning the entire chain.
    • Real-Time Access: Indexers provide real-time or near-real-time access to L2 events, balances, or states.
    • Developer Efficiency: Tools like The Graph, Covalent, or custom indexers simplify data retrieval for developers building on L2.
  2. Challenges in Indexing L2 Chains
    • Data Availability: Some L2 solutions (e.g., Optimistic Rollups) rely on L1 for data availability, requiring indexers to sync with both layers.
    • State Validity: ZK-Rollups use cryptographic proofs, while Optimistic Rollups assume validity unless challenged. Indexers must account for potential state reversions.
    • Heterogeneity: Different L2 solutions have unique architectures, requiring tailored indexing approaches.
    • Cost: Indexing large volumes of L2 transactions can be resource-intensive.
  3. Indexing Approaches
    • Subgraphs (e.g., The Graph): Developers define subgraphs to index specific L2 events or smart contract data. Subgraphs map L2 transactions to a GraphQL API for querying.
    • Custom Indexers: For specialized needs, developers can build indexers that sync with L2 nodes, parse transaction batches, and store data in databases like PostgreSQL or MongoDB.
    • APIs and Middleware: Services like Alchemy, Infura, or Covalent provide pre-indexed L2 data via APIs, reducing the need for custom infrastructure.
    • Event Logs: Indexers often focus on smart contract event logs (e.g., Transfer, Approval) emitted on L2, which are batched to L1.

Handling Custom Data

  1. What is Custom Data in L2 Contexts?
    • On-Chain: Metadata for NFTs, user profiles, or DeFi transaction details stored in L2 smart contracts.
    • Off-Chain: Data linked to L2 via IPFS, Arweave, or centralized servers (e.g., game scores, user preferences).
    • Hybrid: Combinations where on-chain pointers (hashes) reference off-chain data.
  2. Indexing Custom Data
    • Schema Definition: Define a schema for custom data (e.g., JSON, GraphQL) to structure how it’s stored and queried.
    • Event-Based Indexing: Smart contracts emit events for custom data changes. Indexers listen for these events and update databases.
    • Off-Chain Integration: For off-chain data, indexers may fetch content from IPFS or APIs and associate it with on-chain events.
    • Searchability: Use tools like Elasticsearch or custom SQL queries to make custom data searchable.
  3. Tools and Protocols
    • The Graph: Widely used for indexing L2 and custom data. Developers deploy subgraphs to track specific L2 contracts or events.
    • Covalent: Provides unified APIs for indexing data across multiple L2 chains.
    • Dune Analytics: Useful for custom SQL-based indexing of L2 data for analytics.
    • Custom Solutions: Use L2 node APIs (e.g., Arbitrum’s JSON-RPC) to build bespoke indexers.

Practical Example

Suppose you’re building a dApp on Arbitrum that tracks NFT trades with custom metadata (e.g., artist name, creation date). You could:

  1. Deploy a smart contract on Arbitrum that emits a Trade event with NFT ID and metadata hash.
  2. Create a subgraph using The Graph to index Trade events, mapping them to a database.
  3. Fetch metadata from IPFS using the hash and index it alongside on-chain data.
  4. Expose the indexed data via a GraphQL API for your dApp’s frontend.

Supported networks: Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base

Hey there! It sounds like you’re diving into indexing Layer 2 (L2) chains, probably thinking about tools like The Graph, Covalent, or maybe even a custom setup, as you mentioned in your earlier question about “Chapter 9: Indexing Layer 2 Chains and Custom Data.” You listed Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, which are some of the go-to L2 or sidechain solutions for making Ethereum faster and cheaper. I’ll give you a quick, friendly rundown of these networks, what makes them special for indexing, and things to keep in mind when working with their data. If you’ve got a specific question or want me to zoom in on a tool or setup, just let me know!

Supported Networks Overview

  1. Polygon (Polygon PoS Chain)
    • Type: Sidechain (with bridges to Ethereum)
    • Description: A Layer 2 scaling solution that uses a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism. It processes transactions off-chain and checkpoints them to Ethereum.
    • Indexing Considerations:
      • Data Source: Polygon’s PoS chain operates independently but syncs with Ethereum via the State Sync mechanism. Indexers must connect to Polygon nodes (e.g., via JSON-RPC) or use APIs like Alchemy or QuickNode.
      • Events: Index smart contract events (e.g., ERC-20 transfers, NFT mints) emitted on Polygon.
      • Custom Data: Often includes NFT metadata or DeFi transaction details stored on-chain or via IPFS.
      • Tools: The Graph supports Polygon subgraphs; Covalent provides APIs for Polygon data.
      • Challenge: High transaction volume requires optimized indexing to manage costs and latency.
  2. Arbitrum (Arbitrum One and Nitro)
    • Type: Optimistic Rollup
    • Description: A Layer 2 solution that batches transactions and posts them to Ethereum, assuming validity unless challenged during a 7-day dispute period.
    • Indexing Considerations:
      • Data Source: Indexers sync with Arbitrum nodes or use APIs (e.g., Arbitrum’s JSON-RPC, Alchemy).
      • State Finality: Account for the challenge period when indexing real-time data, as state can be reverted.
      • Custom Data: Common in NFT or gaming dApps, often linked to IPFS or centralized servers.
      • Tools: The Graph, Covalent, and Dune Analytics support Arbitrum indexing.
      • Challenge: Parsing batched transactions and handling sequencer data for low-latency indexing.
  3. Optimism
    • Type: Optimistic Rollup
    • Description: Similar to Arbitrum, Optimism uses Optimistic Rollups to batch transactions to Ethereum with a challenge period for fraud proofs.
    • Indexing Considerations:
      • Data Source: Connect to Optimism nodes or use APIs like Infura or Alchemy.
      • Event Logs: Focus on smart contract events, which are compressed in rollup batches.
      • Custom Data: Often used in DeFi or governance dApps, with metadata stored on-chain or off-chain.
      • Tools: The Graph and Covalent support Optimism; custom indexers can leverage Optimism’s Bedrock upgrade for better data access.
      • Challenge: Managing gas costs and indexing delays due to Ethereum finality.
  4. Base
    • Type: Optimistic Rollup
    • Description: An Ethereum L2 built by Coinbase, based on the OP Stack (similar to Optimism). It focuses on low-cost, developer-friendly DeFi and dApp ecosystems.
    • Indexing Considerations:
      • Data Source: Sync with Base nodes or use APIs (e.g., Coinbase’s Base API, Alchemy).
      • Compatibility: Shares similarities with Optimism, so indexing tools for Optimism often work for Base.
      • Custom Data: Common in social or consumer dApps, with off-chain data linked via IPFS or centralized APIs.
      • Tools: The Graph and Covalent are starting to support Base; expect broader adoption as Base grows.
      • Challenge: Relatively new network, so indexer support and documentation may be less mature.

Indexing Across These Networks

  • Unified Indexing:
    • Tools like The Graph allow developers to create subgraphs for each network, defining schemas to index events (e.g., Transfer, Swap) or custom data (e.g., NFT metadata).
    • Covalent provides a single API to query indexed data across Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, simplifying cross-chain analytics.
    • Dune Analytics supports SQL-based indexing for these networks, ideal for custom dashboards.
  • Custom Data Handling:
    • On-Chain: Index smart contract events or state changes (e.g., user balances, trade details).
    • Off-Chain: Fetch metadata from IPFS, Arweave, or APIs and associate it with on-chain events.
    • Schema Design: Use GraphQL (The Graph) or SQL (Dune) to structure custom data for querying.
  • Challenges:
    • Interoperability: Each network has unique APIs and data formats, requiring tailored indexers or middleware.
    • Scalability: High transaction throughput (especially on Polygon and Base) demands optimized database designs.
    • Finality: Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) have delayed finality, complicating real-time indexing.

Practical Example

To index an NFT marketplace on these networks:

  1. Deploy the marketplace contract on Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.
  2. Create a subgraph for each network using The Graph, indexing Mint and Sale events.
  3. Fetch NFT metadata (e.g., image URLs, traits) from IPFS and store it in the subgraph.
  4. Query the indexed data via GraphQL for a cross-chain dApp frontend.

Additional Notes

  • Tool Support: As of April 21, 2025, The Graph and Covalent are the most mature for these networks. Base support may lag due to its newer status.
  • Cost Optimization: Use hosted services (e.g., The Graph’s Hosted Service) or batch queries to reduce indexing costs.
  • Decentralized Indexing: The Graph’s decentralized network supports these chains, offering resilience over centralized APIs.

Cross-chain indexing

Hey, let’s chat about cross-chain indexing—it’s all about pulling together and making sense of data from different blockchain networks, specifically the Layer 2 (L2) ones you mentioned: Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. This ties right into your earlier question about “Chapter 9: Indexing Layer 2 Chains and Custom Data,” where we talked about working with L2 chains and custom data. Cross-chain indexing is super handy because it lets you access data from all these networks in one go, which is a big deal for things like decentralized apps (dApps), analytics tools, or wallets that need to juggle multiple chains. I’ll break down how it works for these networks, share the main ways to do it, highlight some tools, point out potential hiccups, and give you practical tips to make it happen.

Why Cross-Chain Indexing?

  • Unified Data Access: Provide a single interface (e.g., API, dashboard) to query events, balances, or custom data across Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.
  • Interoperability: Support dApps that interact with multiple L2s (e.g., cross-chain NFT marketplaces, DeFi aggregators).
  • Analytics: Enable cross-chain analytics, such as comparing transaction volumes or gas costs across networks.
  • User Experience: Simplify data retrieval for end-users, avoiding the need to query each chain separately.

Supported Networks for Cross-Chain Indexing

As mentioned, the networks are:

  • Polygon (PoS): A sidechain with high transaction throughput, using PoS consensus.
  • Arbitrum (One/Nitro): An Optimistic Rollup with batched transactions and a 7-day challenge period.
  • Optimism: An Optimistic Rollup, similar to Arbitrum, built on the OP Stack.
  • Base: An Optimistic Rollup, also on the OP Stack, focused on low-cost dApps.

Each network has unique data structures, APIs, and finality mechanisms, making cross-chain indexing complex but feasible with the right tools and strategies.

Approaches to Cross-Chain Indexing

  1. Unified Indexing Protocols
    • The Graph:
      • How It Works: Developers create subgraphs for each network (Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) to index specific smart contract events or custom data. A frontend or backend can query all subgraphs via a unified GraphQL API.
      • Cross-Chain: Use a single GraphQL endpoint to aggregate data from multiple subgraphs, each tied to a different chain.
      • Example: Index Transfer events for an ERC-20 token across all four networks and query them together.
      • Support: The Graph supports all four networks as of April 21, 2025, with hosted and decentralized options.
    • Covalent:
      • How It Works: Provides a unified REST API to access pre-indexed data (e.g., balances, transactions, events) across Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.
      • Cross-Chain: A single API call can retrieve data from multiple chains, with built-in normalization.
      • Example: Fetch wallet balances for a user across all four networks in one query.
      • Support: Covalent covers these networks, with Base support growing as adoption increases.
  2. Custom Indexers
    • How It Works: Build a custom indexing pipeline by syncing with nodes for each network (e.g., Polygon’s Bor, Arbitrum’s Nitro, Optimism’s Bedrock, Base’s OP Stack nodes) and storing data in a unified database (e.g., PostgreSQL, MongoDB).
    • Cross-Chain: Normalize data (e.g., transaction formats, event logs) across chains and expose it via a custom API (REST, GraphQL).
    • Example: Index NFT Sale events from all four chains, store them in a database, and query via a single endpoint.
    • Challenges: Requires significant infrastructure and maintenance but offers full control.
  3. Middleware and APIs
    • Providers: Alchemy, Infura, QuickNode, or Coinbase’s Base API provide node access and pre-indexed data for these networks.
    • Cross-Chain: Aggregate data by querying each network’s API and combining results in a backend service.
    • Example: Use Alchemy’s APIs to fetch transaction histories from Polygon and Arbitrum, then merge them for a dApp.
    • Support: Most providers support all four networks, though Base may have newer or limited API features.
  4. Analytics Platforms
    • Dune Analytics:
      • How It Works: Use SQL to query and index data from Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, creating custom dashboards or datasets.
      • Cross-Chain: Combine data from multiple chains in a single SQL query or visualization.
      • Example: Compare gas usage or transaction counts across all four networks.
      • Support: Dune supports these networks, with robust community-driven queries.

Handling Custom Data in Cross-Chain Indexing

  • On-Chain Custom Data:
    • Index smart contract events (e.g., MetadataUpdated) or state changes (e.g., user profiles) across all four networks.
    • Example: Track NFT metadata updates on Polygon and Arbitrum in a single database.
  • Off-Chain Custom Data:
    • Fetch metadata from IPFS, Arweave, or centralized APIs linked to on-chain events.
    • Example: Index NFT image URLs stored on IPFS for tokens on Optimism and Base.
  • Normalization:
    • Standardize data formats (e.g., JSON schemas) to ensure consistency across chains.
    • Example: Convert Polygon’s and Arbitrum’s event logs into a unified Trade object with fields like tokenId, price, and chain.

Key Challenges

  1. Data Heterogeneity:
    • Each network has different transaction formats, event encodings, and APIs (e.g., Polygon’s PoS vs. Arbitrum’s rollup batches).
    • Solution: Use tools like Covalent or The Graph for pre-normalized data or write custom parsers.
  2. Finality and Latency:
    • Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) have delayed finality due to challenge periods, complicating real-time indexing.
    • Polygon has faster finality but requires syncing with Ethereum checkpoints.
    • Solution: Index unconfirmed data with a “pending” status and update after finality.
  3. Scalability:
    • High transaction volumes (especially on Polygon and Base) can strain indexing infrastructure.
    • Solution: Optimize database queries, use batch processing, or leverage hosted services.
  4. Cost:
    • Running nodes or querying APIs for multiple chains can be expensive.
    • Solution: Use decentralized protocols (e.g., The Graph’s network) or cost-efficient APIs like Covalent.
  5. Tool Support for Base:
    • As a newer network, Base may have limited support in some indexing tools compared to Polygon or Arbitrum.
    • Solution: Check for recent updates from The Graph or Covalent, or build custom indexers for Base.

Practical Example: Cross-Chain NFT Marketplace

To index an NFT marketplace operating on Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base:

  1. Subgraphs (The Graph):
    • Deploy a subgraph for each network to index Mint and Sale events from the marketplace contract.
    • Define a unified GraphQL schema with fields like tokenId, price, chain, and metadata.
    • Query all subgraphs via a single GraphQL endpoint to display NFTs across chains.
  2. Covalent API:
    • Use Covalent’s API to fetch Sale events and token balances for the marketplace across all four networks.
    • Combine results in a backend to power a cross-chain dashboard.
  3. Custom Indexer:
    • Sync with nodes for each network (e.g., Polygon’s Bor, Arbitrum’s Nitro).
    • Parse events and store them in a PostgreSQL database with a chain column to differentiate networks.
    • Expose data via a REST API for the dApp frontend.
  4. Custom Data:
    • Fetch NFT metadata (e.g., image, traits) from IPFS using on-chain hashes.
    • Index metadata alongside on-chain events for unified querying.

Indexing LSTs, LPs, and NFTs

Hey there! You’ve been diving deep into “Chapter 9: Indexing Layer 2 Chains and Custom Data” and asking about cross-chain indexing on networks like Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. Now you’re curious about how to index Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs), Liquidity Pool Tokens (LPs), and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). These are super common assets in DeFi and Web3, and indexing them across these Layer 2 (L2) networks means keeping track of their smart contract events, states, and extra details like metadata. I’m going to walk you through how to index LSTs, LPs, and NFTs, focusing on pulling data from all these networks into one place. I’ll cover the main ideas, tools, challenges, and throw in some practical examples to make it clear.

Overview of Asset Types

  1. Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs):
    • Definition: Tokens representing staked assets in liquid staking protocols (e.g., Lido’s stETH, Rocket Pool’s rETH), allowing users to stake on Ethereum or L2s while maintaining liquidity.
    • Data to Index: Staking events (e.g., Stake, Unstake), token balances, staking rewards, and exchange rates (e.g., stETH:ETH ratio).
    • Custom Data: Metadata like protocol parameters or reward rates, often on-chain or via APIs.
  2. Liquidity Pool Tokens (LPs):
    • Definition: Tokens representing a user’s share in a decentralized exchange (DEX) liquidity pool (e.g., Uniswap, SushiSwap), typically ERC-20 tokens.
    • Data to Index: Pool events (e.g., AddLiquidity, RemoveLiquidity, Swap), pool balances, fees earned, and underlying token pairs.
    • Custom Data: Pool metadata (e.g., token pairs, APY), often stored on-chain or fetched from DEX APIs.
  3. Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs):
    • Definition: Unique tokens (e.g., ERC-721, ERC-1155) representing digital assets like art, collectibles, or in-game items.
    • Data to Index: Minting, transfer, and sale events (e.g., Transfer, Sale), token ownership, and token IDs.
    • Custom Data: Metadata (e.g., image URLs, traits), typically stored off-chain on IPFS, Arweave, or centralized servers.

Indexing LSTs, LPs, and NFTs Across Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base

1. General Approach to Indexing

  • Smart Contract Events: Most LSTs, LPs, and NFTs emit standard events (e.g., Transfer for ERC-20/ERC-721, protocol-specific events like Stake or Swap) that indexers can listen to.
  • Cross-Chain: Index events from each network (Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) and aggregate them into a unified dataset or API.
  • Tools:
    • The Graph: Create subgraphs for each network to index events and custom data, queried via GraphQL.
    • Covalent: Use a unified API to fetch pre-indexed data across chains.
    • Dune Analytics: Write SQL queries for custom analytics on these assets.
    • Custom Indexers: Sync with L2 nodes and store data in a database (e.g., PostgreSQL).
  • Custom Data: Fetch off-chain metadata (e.g., NFT images, pool APYs) and associate it with on-chain events.

2. Indexing LSTs

  • Key Data:
    • Events: Stake, Unstake, Withdraw, RewardPaid (e.g., from Lido or Ankr contracts).
    • State: User balances, total staked amount, staking rewards, exchange rates.
    • Custom Data: Protocol metadata (e.g., staking APY, validator info), often via APIs or on-chain queries.
  • Cross-Chain Considerations:
    • LSTs are less common on L2s than Ethereum but exist on Polygon (e.g., Ankr’s aMATIC) and Arbitrum (e.g., Lido’s wstETH). Optimism and Base may have emerging support.
    • Check protocol documentation for L2 deployments (e.g., Lido on Arbitrum).
  • Indexing Process:
    • The Graph: Create a subgraph for each network to index LST contract events (e.g., Stake(address user, uint amount)). Define a schema like: graphql 
type StakeEvent @entity {
  id: ID!
  user: Bytes!
  amount: BigInt!
  timestamp: BigInt!
  chain: String!
}

Query across chains for a unified view of staking activity.

  • Covalent: Use API endpoints like /events/ to fetch LST events across Polygon and Arbitrum.
  • Custom Indexer: Sync with L2 nodes, parse events, and store in a database with a chain field.
  • Example: Index Lido’s wstETH on Arbitrum and Ankr’s aMATIC on Polygon to track user stakes and rewards.

3. Indexing LPs

  • Key Data:
    • Events: AddLiquidity, RemoveLiquidity, Swap, Mint, Burn (e.g., from Uniswap V3 or SushiSwap).
    • State: Pool balances, user LP token balances, fees earned, token pair prices.
    • Custom Data: Pool metadata (e.g., token pair, APY, TVL), often via DEX APIs or on-chain queries.
  • Cross-Chain Considerations:
    • Popular DEXs like Uniswap, SushiSwap, or QuickSwap operate on Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.
    • Event structures are similar (e.g., ERC-20 Transfer for LP tokens), but contract addresses and pool parameters differ.
  • Indexing Process:
    • The Graph: Deploy subgraphs for each network’s DEX contracts (e.g., QuickSwap on Polygon, Uniswap on Optimism). Example schema: graphql 
type LiquidityEvent @entity {
  id: ID!
  pool: Bytes!
  user: Bytes!
  amount0: BigInt!
  amount1: BigInt!
  chain: String!
}

Aggregate data for cross-chain pool analytics.

  • Covalent: Query /tokens/{contract_address}/events/ for LP token events across chains.
  • Dune Analytics: Write SQL to track pool TVL or fees across networks.
  • Example: Index Uniswap V3 pools on Optimism and QuickSwap pools on Polygon to compare liquidity provision.

4. Indexing NFTs

  • Key Data:
    • Events: Transfer, Mint, Sale (e.g., from ERC-721 or marketplace contracts like OpenSea).
    • State: Token ownership, token IDs, sale prices.
    • Custom Data: Metadata (e.g., name, image, traits), typically stored on IPFS or centralized servers.
  • Cross-Chain Considerations:
    • NFTs are widely used on all four networks, with marketplaces like OpenSea or Rarible supporting Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.
    • Metadata storage varies (IPFS, Arweave, or HTTP URLs), requiring off-chain fetching.
  • Indexing Process:
    • The Graph: Create subgraphs for NFT contracts or marketplaces on each network. Example schema: graphql 
type NFTTransfer @entity {
  id: ID!
  tokenId: BigInt!
  from: Bytes!
  to: Bytes!
  chain: String!
  metadata: NFTMetadata
}
type NFTMetadata @entity {
  id: ID!
  name: String!
  image: String!
  traits: [String!]!
}

Fetch metadata from IPFS using on-chain URIs.

  • Covalent: Use /nft/{contract_address}/transactions/ to track NFT transfers and sales.
  • Custom Indexer: Parse Transfer events and fetch metadata via IPFS or HTTP APIs.
  • Example: Index an NFT collection on Polygon and a marketplace like OpenSea on Arbitrum to track ownership and sales.

Cross-Chain Indexing for LSTs, LPs, and NFTs

  • Unified Schema:
    • Design a schema to normalize data across chains, e.g.: graphql
type AssetEvent @entity {
  id: ID!
  type: String! # "LST", "LP", "NFT"
  chain: String! # "Polygon", "Arbitrum", etc.
  user: Bytes!
  amount: BigInt
  tokenId: BigInt
  timestamp: BigInt!
  metadata: String
}
  • Map LST, LP, and NFT events to this schema for cross-chain querying.
  • Aggregation:
    • Use The Graph’s GraphQL API to query subgraphs for all networks.
    • Use Covalent’s API to fetch events for LSTs, LPs, and NFTs in a single call.
    • Combine data in a backend or database for custom analytics.
  • Custom Data Handling:
    • Fetch LST metadata (e.g., staking APY) from protocol APIs.
    • Retrieve LP metadata (e.g., pool APY) from DEX APIs or on-chain queries.
    • Access NFT metadata from IPFS or HTTP URLs linked to on-chain token URIs.

Tools and Protocols

  • The Graph: Best for flexible, subgraph-based indexing of LSTs, LPs, and NFTs across all four networks.
  • Covalent: Simplifies cross-chain indexing with a unified API, ideal for quick integration.
  • Dune Analytics: Powerful for SQL-based analytics, e.g., comparing LST yields or NFT sales volumes.
  • Custom Indexers: Sync with L2 nodes (e.g., Polygon’s Bor, Arbitrum’s Nitro) and use databases like PostgreSQL.
  • APIs: Alchemy, Infura, or QuickNode for node access; Coinbase’s Base API for Base-specific data.

Challenges

  1. Data Heterogeneity:
    • LST, LP, and NFT contracts have different event structures and metadata formats.
    • Solution: Normalize data in schemas or use tools like Covalent for pre-processed data.
  2. Cross-Chain Consistency:
    • Contract addresses and token standards differ across networks.
    • Solution: Map equivalent contracts (e.g., Uniswap V3 on Optimism and Arbitrum) in the indexer.
  3. Finality Delays:
    • Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) have challenge periods, affecting real-time indexing.
    • Solution: Index pending data and update after finality.
  4. Metadata Access:
    • Off-chain metadata (e.g., NFT images) may be unavailable if IPFS nodes or servers are down.
    • Solution: Cache metadata locally or use redundant storage (e.g., Arweave).
  5. Scalability:
    • High transaction volumes (e.g., Polygon’s DEXs, Base’s NFT marketplaces) strain indexers.
    • Solution: Optimize queries, use batch processing, or leverage hosted services.

Practical Example: Cross-Chain DeFi and NFT Dashboard

To build a dashboard tracking LSTs, LPs, and NFTs across Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base:

  1. Subgraphs (The Graph):
    • Deploy subgraphs for:
      • Lido’s wstETH on Arbitrum (index Stake, Withdraw).
      • Uniswap V3 on Optimism (index Swap, AddLiquidity).
      • OpenSea on Polygon (index Sale, Transfer for NFTs).
      • Ankr’s aMATIC on Polygon and an NFT collection on Base.
    • Query all subgraphs via a unified GraphQL API.
  2. Covalent API:
    • Fetch events for LSTs, LPs, and NFTs using /events/ or /nft/ endpoints.
    • Combine data in a backend to display user portfolios.
  3. Custom Data:
    • Fetch NFT metadata from IPFS for Polygon and Base NFTs.
    • Query Uniswap’s API for pool APYs on Optimism.
    • Use Lido’s API for staking reward rates on Arbitrum.
  4. Output:
    • Display a dashboard showing:
      • LST balances and rewards (e.g., wstETH on Arbitrum).
      • LP positions and fees (e.g., Uniswap on Optimism).
      • NFT ownership and sale history (e.g., OpenSea on Polygon).

Bonus Tips

  • Decentralized Indexing: Use The Graph’s decentralized network for resilience.
  • Caching: Cache metadata and frequent queries to reduce costs and latency.
  • Monitoring: Track indexer sync status and chain finality to ensure accuracy.
  • Extensibility: Design schemas to support new asset types or L2s (e.g., zkSync).

Example: Cross-chain NFT rarity explorer

Below, I’ll provide a detailed example of how to implement this, including the indexing setup, rarity calculation, cross-chain aggregation, and a practical workflow using tools like The Graph and Covalent. I’ll also address challenges and provide a sample schema and code snippets.

What is a Cross-Chain NFT Rarity Explorer?

A cross-chain NFT rarity explorer is a dApp or tool that:

  • Indexes NFT data (e.g., Transfer events, metadata) from multiple L2 networks (Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base).
  • Fetches and processes NFT metadata (e.g., traits like background, hat, eyes for a collection like CryptoPunks).
  • Calculates rarity scores for each NFT based on trait frequencies.
  • Displays results in a unified interface, allowing users to explore NFTs and their rarity across chains.

Example Use Case: A user wants to compare the rarity of their Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs on Polygon and Arbitrum or explore rare NFTs on a new collection on Base.

Key Components

  1. Indexing NFT Data:
    • Capture on-chain events (Transfer, Mint, Sale) from NFT contracts or marketplaces (e.g., OpenSea, Rarible).
    • Fetch off-chain metadata (e.g., traits, images) from IPFS or HTTP URLs.
    • Aggregate data across Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.
  2. Rarity Calculation:
    • Analyze NFT traits (e.g., “Blue Background,” “Gold Hat”) and their frequencies.
    • Compute a rarity score for each NFT (e.g., based on trait rarity or statistical methods).
  3. Cross-Chain Aggregation:
    • Normalize and combine data from all four networks into a unified dataset.
    • Expose data via an API or frontend for querying.
  4. User Interface:
    • Display NFTs with their traits, rarity scores, and chain of origin.
    • Allow filtering by collection, chain, or rarity.

Tools and Setup

  • The Graph: Use subgraphs to index NFT events and metadata for each network, queried via GraphQL.
  • Covalent: Leverage a unified API to fetch NFT transactions and metadata across chains.
  • IPFS: Access NFT metadata stored off-chain.
  • Custom Backend: Process metadata, calculate rarity, and serve data to a frontend.
  • Frontend: Build a UI (e.g., React, Next.js) to display the explorer.

Step-by-Step Example: Cross-Chain NFT Rarity Explorer

1. Define the Scope

  • NFT Collections: Index a specific collection (e.g., a fictional “CryptoKittiesV2” deployed on Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base) or a marketplace (e.g., OpenSea contracts on each chain).
  • Events to Index:
    • ERC-721/ERC-1155 Transfer events to track ownership.
    • Marketplace events (e.g., Sale for price data).
  • Metadata: Fetch traits (e.g., “Fur Color,” “Eye Type”) from IPFS or HTTP URLs.
  • Networks: Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base.

2. Indexing NFT Data with The Graph

Step 1: Create Subgraphs for Each Network

  • Deploy a subgraph for each network to index NFT contract events and metadata.
  • Example: Index CryptoKittiesV2 contracts on Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.

Subgraph Schema (schema.graphql):

graphql

type NFT @entity {
  id: ID! # tokenId-chain
  tokenId: BigInt!
  owner: Bytes!
  contract: Bytes!
  chain: String!
  metadata: NFTMetadata
  rarityScore: BigDecimal
}

type NFTMetadata @entity {
  id: ID! # tokenId-chain
  name: String!
  image: String!
  traits: [Trait!]!
}

type Trait @entity {
  id: ID! # tokenId-chain-traitType
  traitType: String!
  value: String!
}

type Transfer @entity {
  id: ID!
  tokenId: BigInt!
  from: Bytes!
  to: Bytes!
  chain: String!
  timestamp: BigInt!
}

Step 2: Mapping Logic (mapping.ts)

  • Listen for Transfer events from the NFT contract.
  • Fetch metadata from the token URI (e.g., IPFS or HTTP).
  • Example mapping for Arbitrum’s CryptoKittiesV2:

typescript

import { Transfer } from "../generated/CryptoKittiesV2/CryptoKittiesV2";
import { NFT, NFTMetadata, Transfer, Trait } from "../generated/schema";
import { fetchTokenURI, fetchMetadata } from "./utils"; // Hypothetical utility functions

export function handleTransfer(event: Transfer): void {
  let tokenId = event.params.tokenId.toString();
  let chain = "Arbitrum";
  let nftId = tokenId + "-" + chain;

  // Update NFT entity
  let nft = NFT.load(nftId);
  if (!nft) {
    nft = new NFT(nftId);
    nft.tokenId = event.params.tokenId;
    nft.contract = event.address;
    nft.chain = chain;
  }
  nft.owner = event.params.to;
  nft.save();

  // Record Transfer event
  let transfer = new Transfer(event.transaction.hash.toHex() + "-" + tokenId);
  transfer.tokenId = event.params.tokenId;
  transfer.from = event.params.from;
  transfer.to = event.params.to;
  transfer.chain = chain;
  transfer.timestamp = event.block.timestamp;
  transfer.save();

  // Fetch and store metadata
  let tokenURI = fetchTokenURI(event.address, event.params.tokenId); // Call contract's tokenURI
  let metadata = fetchMetadata(tokenURI); // Fetch JSON from IPFS/HTTP
  let metadataEntity = new NFTMetadata(nftId);
  metadataEntity.name = metadata.name;
  metadataEntity.image = metadata.image;
  metadataEntity.save();

  // Store traits
  for (let i = 0; i < metadata.traits.length; i++) {
    let trait = new Trait(nftId + "-" + metadata.traits[i].trait_type);
    trait.traitType = metadata.traits[i].trait_type;
    trait.value = metadata.traits[i].value;
    trait.save();
  }
  nft.metadata = metadataEntity.id;
  nft.save();
}

Step 3: Deploy Subgraphs

  • Deploy separate subgraphs for CryptoKittiesV2 on Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base using The Graph’s Hosted Service or decentralized network.
  • Configure each subgraph with the contract address and ABI for the respective chain.

Step 4: Query Cross-Chain Data

  • Use a single GraphQL endpoint to query all subgraphs.
  • Example query:

graphql

query {
  polygon: nfts(where: { chain: "Polygon" }) {
    id
    tokenId
    owner
    chain
    metadata { name, image, traits { traitType, value } }
  }
  arbitrum: nfts(where: { chain: "Arbitrum" }) {
    id
    tokenId
    owner
    chain
    metadata { name, image, traits { traitType, value } }
  }
  optimism: nfts(where: { chain: "Optimism" }) {
    id
    tokenId
    owner
    chain
    metadata { name, image, traits { traitType, value } }
  }
  base: nfts(where: { chain: "Base" }) {
    id
    tokenId
    owner
    chain
    metadata { name, image, traits { traitType, value } }
  }
}

3. Alternative: Indexing with Covalent

  • Why Covalent?: Simplifies cross-chain indexing with a unified API, avoiding the need to deploy subgraphs.
  • Steps:
    1. Fetch Transfer events for CryptoKittiesV2 contracts on Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base using Covalent’s /events/ endpoint.
      • Example: GET /v1/{chain_id}/events/{contract_address}/
      • Chain IDs: Polygon (137), Arbitrum (42161), Optimism (10), Base (8453).
    2. Retrieve NFT metadata using Covalent’s /nft/{contract_address}/metadata/ endpoint.
    3. Store data in a backend database (e.g., MongoDB) with fields for tokenId, owner, chain, and metadata.
  • Example API Call:

bash

curl -X GET "https://api.covalenthq.com/v1/137/events/{CryptoKittiesV2_address}/?key={API_KEY}" -H "Accept: application/json"
  • Backend Processing:
    • Combine event data from all four chains.
    • Fetch metadata for each tokenId and store traits.

4. Calculating Rarity Scores

  • Methodology:
    • For each trait (e.g., “Fur Color: Blue”), calculate its frequency across the collection.
    • Rarity score for an NFT = sum of inverse trait frequencies (or use a weighted formula).
    • Example:
      • Trait “Fur Color: Blue” appears in 10% of NFTs → Rarity = 1/0.1 = 10.
      • Trait “Eye Type: Laser” appears in 1% of NFTs → Rarity = 1/0.01 = 100.
      • NFT with both traits: Rarity Score = 10 + 100 = 110.
  • Implementation:
    • Query all NFTs and their traits from The Graph or Covalent.
    • Compute trait frequencies per collection per chain.
    • Calculate rarity scores and update the NFT.rarityScore field.
  • Sample Code (Node.js):

javascript

const traits = await fetchTraitsFromGraphQL(); // Query traits from subgraphs
const traitFrequencies = {};
const totalNFTs = traits.length;

// Calculate trait frequencies
traits.forEach(nft => {
  nft.metadata.traits.forEach(trait => {
    const key = `${trait.traitType}:${trait.value}`;
    traitFrequencies[key] = (traitFrequencies[key] || 0) + 1;
  });
});

// Calculate rarity scores
const rarityScores = traits.map(nft => {
  let score = 0;
  nft.metadata.traits.forEach(trait => {
    const key = `${trait.traitType}:${trait.value}`;
    const frequency = traitFrequencies[key] / totalNFTs;
    score += 1 / frequency; // Inverse frequency
  });
  return { tokenId: nft.tokenId, chain: nft.chain, rarityScore: score };
});

// Update NFT entities (e.g., via The Graph or database)
rarityScores.forEach(({ tokenId, chain, rarityScore }) => {
  updateNFT(tokenId, chain, { rarityScore });
});

5. Cross-Chain Aggregation

  • The Graph:
    • Query all subgraphs to combine NFT data into a unified dataset.
    • Normalize fields (e.g., tokenId, owner, traits) across chains.
  • Covalent:
    • Fetch data for all chains and merge in a backend.
    • Example: Combine CryptoKittiesV2 NFTs from Polygon and Arbitrum into a single array.
  • Database:
    • Store aggregated data in a database (e.g., PostgreSQL) with a chain column.
    • Schema: sql
CREATE TABLE nfts (
  id VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY, -- tokenId-chain
  token_id BIGINT,
  owner VARCHAR,
  contract VARCHAR,
  chain VARCHAR,
  metadata JSONB,
  rarity_score DECIMAL
);

6. Building the Frontend

  • Framework: Use React or Next.js to create a responsive UI.
  • Features:
    • Display NFTs with images, traits, and rarity scores.
    • Filter by chain, collection, or rarity (e.g., “Show top 10 rarest NFTs on Base”).
    • Sort by rarity score or recent transfers.
  • Example Query (GraphQL):

graphql

query {
  nfts(orderBy: rarityScore, orderDirection: desc, first: 10) {
    id
    tokenId
    owner
    chain
    metadata { name, image, traits { traitType, value } }
    rarityScore
  }
}
  • Sample UI Code (React):

jsx

import { useQuery, gql } from "@apollo/client";

const NFT_QUERY = gql`
  query {
    nfts(orderBy: rarityScore, orderDirection: desc, first: 10) {
      id
      tokenId
      owner
      chain
      metadata { name, image, traits { traitType, value } }
      rarityScore
    }
  }
`;

function NFTRarityExplorer() {
  const { loading, error, data } = useQuery(NFT_QUERY);

  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
  if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>;

  return (
    <div>
      <h1>Cross-Chain NFT Rarity Explorer</h1>
      <div className="nft-grid">
        {data.nfts.map(nft => (
          <div key={nft.id} className="nft-card">
            <img src={nft.metadata.image} alt={nft.metadata.name} />
            <h3>{nft.metadata.name}</h3>
            <p>Chain: {nft.chain}</p>
            <p>Rarity Score: {nft.rarityScore}</p>
            <ul>
              {nft.metadata.traits.map(trait => (
                <li key={trait.id}>{trait.traitType}: {trait.value}</li>
              ))}
            </ul>
          </div>
        ))}
      </div>
    </div>
  );
}

7. Deployment

  • Subgraphs: Deploy to The Graph’s Hosted Service or decentralized network.
  • Backend: Host the rarity calculation and aggregation logic on a server (e.g., AWS, Vercel).
  • Frontend: Deploy the UI to a platform like Vercel or Netlify.
  • APIs: Use Covalent’s API or a custom REST API for real-time data.

Challenges and Solutions

  1. Metadata Access:
    • Challenge: IPFS or HTTP URLs may be slow or unavailable.
    • Solution: Cache metadata locally or use redundant storage (e.g., Arweave).
  2. Cross-Chain Contract Variations:
    • Challenge: CryptoKittiesV2 may have different contract addresses or slight variations across chains.
    • Solution: Map equivalent contracts in the indexer and normalize event data.
  3. Finality Delays:
    • Challenge: Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) have 7-day challenge periods, affecting real-time data.
    • Solution: Index pending transfers with a “pending” status and update after finality.
  4. Scalability:
    • Challenge: Large collections (e.g., 10,000 NFTs) with frequent transfers strain indexers.
    • Solution: Optimize queries, batch metadata fetching, and use hosted services like The Graph.
  5. Rarity Accuracy:
    • Challenge: Trait frequencies must be calculated across all NFTs in a collection for accurate rarity.
    • Solution: Ensure all NFTs are indexed before computing frequencies.

Example Output

The explorer might display:

  • NFT #123 on Polygon:
    • Name: CryptoKitty #123
    • Traits: Fur Color: Blue (10%), Eye Type: Laser (1%)
    • Rarity Score: 110
    • Owner: 0xABC…
    • Image: ipfs://…
  • NFT #456 on Arbitrum:
    • Name: CryptoKitty #456
    • Traits: Fur Color: Red (5%), Eye Type: Normal (50%)
    • Rarity Score: 22
    • Owner: 0xDEF…
    • Image: ipfs://…

Users can filter by chain (e.g., “Show Polygon NFTs”) or sort by rarity score.

Tags:

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *